On Good Samaritans

The California Supreme Court was not working with Mother Teresa, Father Flanagan, and Florence Nightengale.  And the activities that preceded the accident were not the stuff of a Mayberry social.  Still, the decision does give us pause.  Lisa Torti pulled Alexandra Van Horn from the car in which Van Horn was riding at the time the car’s driver, one Anthony Glen Watson, struck a curb and then a light pole whilst going 45 mph.  Watson struck said curb and light pole after having imbibed at a local bar from 10:00 PM until 1:30 AM.  Torti, who had smoked and inhaled marijuana with Van Horn earlier in the evening and also imbibed at the bar, testified that the crashed car was smoking (?) and that she felt she should save Van Horn before flames ensued.  Van Horn, who was paralyzed as a result of the accident (and, she claimed, Torti’s pulling her from the wreck) sued Torti and several other party animals riding along in the two vehicles for their negligence.  Torti claimed immunity under California’s Good Samaritan statute, but the defense, under the state supreme court’s ruling, was not to be hers.

 On October 31, 2004, Torti, Van Horn, and Jonelle Freed were “relaxing” at Torti’s home where they both smoked marijuana.  Anthony Glen Watson and Dion Ofoegbu joined the ladies until 10 when they all headed to a local bar where, as noted earlier, they drank until 1:30 AM.  At 1:30 AM, Van Horn and Freed left with Watson, leaving Torti to ride with Ofoegbu. 

After Watson crashed, both Ofoegbu and Torti stopped and got out of their car to render aid.  Watson got out of the car by himself, Ofoegbu helped Freed out by opening a door for her, and Torti pulled Van Horn from the car.  Van Horn said Torti pulled on her arm and dragged her from the car like a “rag doll.”

Emergency personnel arrived moments later.  Van Horn had a lacerated liver and damaged vertebrae that rendered Van Horn paraplegic.  Van Horn’s suit alleged that Torti’s pulling of her from the crashed car caused her paralysis and that Torti was negligent in pulling her from the car and not waiting for trained personnel.  There were differing accounts on whether the car was smoking and if there were flames.  In other words, the danger to Van Horn was not clear.  In fact, given the evening’s activities, not a one of them was operating in anything less than a fog at the time of the accident. This tragedy should be tied to inhalation and guzzling, not a misguided rescue attempt. 

The trial court granted summary judgment for Torti on the grounds that she enjoyed immunity from suit for negligence under the California Good Samaritan law.  The Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Good Samaritan law applied only to those rendering medical care, and that Torti had not provided medical care.  The California Supreme Court held that whether Torti enjoyed immunity depended on the meaning of “emergency care,” and “emergency care” did not include pulling someone from a vehicle.

We have been trying to fix this “helping others who are hurt” problem for decades with litigation, statutory immunity, and even criminal statutes that impose sanctions for those who refuse to stop and help.  You can’t legislate or litigate your way through complex ethical issues.  In fact, when you try, you make things worse, which is exactly what the California Supreme Court has done.  Here are the ethical issues, now trampled by laws, suits, and criminal statutes:

1.  We have an obligation to stop and help those who are hurt.  Our parents taught us this because they were committed to civilized society.

2.  Those we help have an obligation to be grateful.  We may not be the best, but, at the time, we are all they have.  Poor form to sue those who did their best. You don’t punish those who try, and all in good faith. 

Until we embrace these two ethical obligations, we can’t solve the accident and aid problems.  We will continue to litigate, thereby eroding the traits of compassion and gratitude — the two components we keep trying to ignore in our solutions.  They are in us; let them flourish.     

About mmjdiary

Professor Marianne Jennings is an emeritus professor of legal and ethical studies from the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University, retiring in 2011 after 35 years of teaching undergraduate and graduate courses in ethics and the legal environment of business. During her tenure at ASU, she served as director of the Joan and David Lincoln Center for Applied Ethics from 1995-1999. In 2006, she was appointed faculty director for the W.P. Carey Executive MBA Program. She has done consulting work for businesses and professional groups including AICPA, Boeing, Dial Corporation, Edward Jones, Mattel, Motorola, CFA Institute, Southern California Edison, the Institute of Internal Auditors, AIMR, DuPont, AES, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Motorola, Hy-Vee Foods, IBM, Bell Helicopter, Amgen, Raytheon, and VIAD. The sixth edition of her textbook, Case Studies in Business Ethics, was published in February 2011. The ninth edition of her textbook, Business: lts Legal, Ethical and Global Environment was published in January 2011. The 23rd edition of her book, Business Law: Principles and Cases, will be published in January 2013. The tenth edition of her book, Real Estate Law, will also be published in January 2013. Her book, A Business Tale: A Story of Ethics, Choices, Success, and a Very Large Rabbit, a fable about business ethics, was chosen by Library Journal in 2004 as its business book of the year. A Business Tale was also a finalist for two other literary awards for 2004. In 2000 her book on corporate governance was published by the New York Times MBA Pocket Series. Her book on long-term success, Building a Business Through Good Times and Bad: Lessons from Fifteen Companies, Each With a Century of Dividends, was published in October 2002 and has been used by Booz, Allen, Hamilton for its work on business longevity. Her latest book, The Seven Signs of Ethical Collapse was published by St. Martin’s Press in July 2006 and has been a finalist for two book awards. Her weekly columns are syndicated around the country, and her work has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, the Chicago Tribune, the New York Times, Washington Post, and the Reader's Digest. A collection of her essays, Nobody Fixes Real Carrot Sticks Anymore, first published in 1994 is still being published. She has been a commentator on business issues on All Things Considered for National Public Radio. She has served on four boards of directors, including Arizona Public Service (1987-2000), Zealous Capital Corporation, and the Center for Children with Chronic Illness and Disability at the University of Minnesota. She was appointed to the board of advisors for the Institute of Nuclear Power Operators in 2004 and served on the board of trustees for Think Arizona, a public policy think tank. She has appeared on CNBC, CBS This Morning, the Today Show, and CBS Evening News. In 2010 she was named one of the Top 100 Thought Leaders in Business Ethics by Trust Across America. Her books have been translated into four different languages. She received the British Emerald award for authoring one of their top 50 articles in management publications, chosen from over 15,000 articles. Personal: Married since 1976 to Terry H. Jennings, Maricopa County Attorney’s Office Deputy County Attorney; five children: Sarah, Sam, and John, and the late Claire and Hannah Jennings.
This entry was posted in News and Events. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.